God a designed the changes so that e would be able to survive through changes. If I live in Island and I move to Gabon, my body will adapt to the food, climate, people, ect…My skin will become more tanned, my body will adjust to the local water, and mosquitoes ect. This does not mean that I will change into a different creature. This is completely impossible as for this to be possible first a Divine power would have to perform this which is a supernatural action. Then the codes I the genes would be able to be there first. In the word NEW YORK can I do the word CALIFORNIA? No Why? Because the information is not available.. in the word New York letters like C and A and L are not found , thus in the DNA coding the information is not yet present for a change. Changes can be performed in the code already present. Bringing more hair, darker skin color ect… But no change into something else. No one has ever seen this.

But people say that chimps and humans have 98% od DNA in common. This does not prove anything, it just proves that the same designer used the same material to make humans and chimps. The Honda Civic and the Honda prelude have many things in common. Exhaust pipe, a.c., 4 cilynders, four wheels, ect. Just because I see the similarities, this would mean that the two Hondas evolved from a piece of metal found in Japan millions of years ago? No.

It is just that the same designer of Honda used the same material. Just because things ressemble other things in the universe it not a proof they evolve from each other. God uses the same notarial for his creation and the same method, it is in fact a proof of creation that because we see similarities in the universe, then we can see a Creator who has created all things.

  1. THE GEOLOGICAL COLUMN: Here we are at the theirs point of the things the theory added to science about 150 years ago, with some of them which came latter like the big bang. The geological column was invented by Charles Lyell. Charles Lyell was a friend of Charles Darwin. Charles Lyell hated the Bible, in his book ‘Principles of Geology’ we see him say ‘I want to rid science of Moses’ Thus we see here that there are agendas in the modern evolution world. Some evolutionists especially the leaders do not teach science, but they are in a war against God and do all they can to rid everything about God in science by interpreting it as natural forces. ‘Son may the force be with you’ What is the geological column? The geological column invented by Lyell says that the layers on the earth were deposited by long periods of time, through billions of years.

And that we have different fossils found in the layers. But did someone ever tell you that ll the layers you find in school science textbooks are nowhere to be found anywhere on earth? The geological column as described in the textbooks does not exist anywhere on earth. This geological column is a myth., a fantasy. It only exists in the minds of people. What is their proof that these layers were deposited for long ages? Because we see sometimes ‘simpler’ forms of life in the bottom layers and larger forms of life in the top layers.

Well this does not mean anything. In the Cambrian layer we have Trilobites, how come they suddenly appear out of nowhere? ‘Hey this is me the trilobite, do not mess with me’ No the only way animals could appear suddenly is that they were created by God. But if the evolution was true, we would have the proof that they evolved from one cell slowly then to the trilobite.

‘Well we have not found the proof for the past evolution’ Then do not teach it as fact until you have all the proof. Keep it as fairy tale until then. Then the trilobite has the most complicated eye ever. How could it be termed simple, when the trilobite has the most complex eye ever created? Is it very possible that when the flood happened, the trilobites did not run as fact as the horses and man, thus were buried first, then the creatures who are the most sturdy and strongest would be on the top layers of this earth melting worldwide flood? Totally.

We have found petrified trees which were buried vertically, passing through all the so called ‘geological layers’ How can this be, either a tree took billions of years to grow. Or the flood happened. There is no other solution. Trees do not take billions of years to form.

Then we find creatures such as the octopus found in al layers. This is kind of a problem for the evolutionists. Then we found in 1812 in a layer where no human would be supposed to be found. The questions is: How do we find a skeleton of a woman in a layer where humans would not have supposed to have existed yet? Millions of years before the so called apparence of humans? It is very simple, it is because humans already existed in all the layers, as animals and plants. But a flood happened around 4300 years ago. Immagine that a very powerful worldwide flood would happen today. We know this will never be the case as God said that He would never destroy the earth by a flood again.

But if this was the case and that an amazing amount of water would fall from the sky surpassing by far all hurricane water, and adding that gigantic amounts of water would gush also from the inside of the earth, putting everything upside down on the earth. Then we would have a completely transformed earth. As when Noah’s flood happened no part of the earth has been left untouched. Modern evolutionists do not take in account Noah’s flood, then surely they are completely mistaken on the data they see. As a real scientist would take all data in account and make conclusions accordingly. If a scientist willfully misses data, first he is not honest, he has prejudices and will always end up with false conclusions. Like the one we just saw about the similarities with humans and chimpanzees, not taking into account that God uses the same material for humans and chimps.

For al species to have changed into other species without God to create everything, then there would need to have been something, extremely intelligent, with extreme and careful planning, someone who knew in advance what the end goal would be from the beginning. Someone who would play with his creation and make it go in the path he wanted. Someone who has self power, ans self energy, who would not need to take energy from other things. Thus a I AM . Someone who would had designed a program just like a computer program.

And who would have made it to continue working for many years without stopping. It looks to me that such a system does not exist unless it is God. God is the only person who would have made the universe. The replacement for the evolution community is natural selection. Do Christians believe in natural selection? Yes. God made it so that creatures can have minor changes ‘in the specie’ but these changes can never be observed outside the specie.

Can natural selection be so powerful as to plan, think, have intelligence and energy from herself? No. If natural selection had such power, then natural selection would be a person. Is natural selection a person? No. Then we see that the evolution community is a totally religious system and theory as they give Godlike powers to a non human system called ‘natural selection’. Why this name ‘natural selection’? What’s natural about selection.

Can natural selection think? No. Then how can natural selection know what she wants in advance? How does she know what to select? Is she has no boss over her, then she is the one deciding what end product to have. Can natural selection plan, even millions of years in advance what she wants as the end product? No. As planning only comes from God.

Can natural selection find somewhere energy to make the selection. Selection requires a tremendous amount of energy. Immagine you would be the onel in charge of selection and transforming into your likeness all animals, all plants and all humans on earth. How much energy this would require? How much planning do you think would be required to select and change all creatures on earth? Everyday of their lives, for many years? Quite a lot of planning.

Ho much intelligence is required to select all animals, plants and humans, everyday? Lost of intelligence. Immagine working a place factory and you are the one in charge of selecting what needs to be changed in the planes before they are sent to be sols for commercial use so that millions can fly all over the world. How much intelligence do you think it would require to select and make changes to all the planes? Then natural selection would not need intelligence to select? Come on be honest!

Anything made requires intelligence. Question: Is the creator of something, like a painting or a movie ect. More or less intelligent than the thing he or she has created? The answer is ‘the creator of something is more intelligent that the thing he creates. Then is it not very easy to see that even after hundreds of years of science, many scientists realize they do not know almost anything about the universe. Then we can conclude that the universe is extremely complex, and we can also conclude that someone extremely intelligent created the universe.

Then to who this Creator is would be a personal research. As to Allah, Jesus, Bhoudah ect. Personaly I have no doubt that Jesus created the universe as it says in John 1:1-3 ‘ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.’

Jesus is the Creator of all things. Whether planets of animals or humans

Colossians 1:15:17 ‘ Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.’

Here is says that not only Jesus created al things in the universe, but that the things in the universe consist in Him. Why do planets keep on spinning? How do bones grow of a child in a mothers’s womb? Why did animals grow to a certain point? How do cells and atoms stay together? Because of Jesus’ power. All things consist in Jesus.

Many people ask me the question about. Well if God exists why don’t He talk to everybody on earth. This question comes from thinking that God is supposed to come to everyone on earth and tell them about His existence. It is like the president of the Usa coming to every home in the USA and telling everyone in the USA that he is the president of the United States and would have to explain to them what the laws in the Usa are.


The same thing for God. As a human being who was born on earth, you have the personal responsability to search for yourself what truth is and why you are here and to search who God is and what He requires of you. It is not to God to come to you. Although sometimes God comes to someone personally to tell them about his existence. We have the instance of Saul of Tarsus who was traveling trying to lock up Christians and to put them in jail and kill them:


Acts 9:1-21 ‘And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest, And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem. And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?

And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink. And there was a certain disciple at Damascus, named Ananias; and to him said the Lord in a vision, Ananias. And he said, Behold, I am here, Lord. And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the street which is called Straight, and enquire in the house of Judas for one called Saul, of Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth,

And hath seen in a vision a man named Ananias coming in, and putting his hand on him, that he might receive his sight. Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:

For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name’s sake.


And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost. And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized. And when he had received meat, he was strengthened.


Then was Saul certain days with the disciples which were at Damascus. And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God. But all that heard him were amazed, and said; Is not this he that destroyed them which called on this name in Jerusalem, and came hither for that intent, that he might bring them bound unto the chief priests?’

Here we see the example of God calling a man Saul of Tarsus, who later changed his name to the apostle Paul. But in the majority of cases it is to mn to find out Why is he born on earth Who rules the universe What truth is And examine the Bible by him or herself. By that I mean study the Bible in an honest way as someone who would read the Bible with the intention to disprove it or to find faults with the Bible would not be profited.


To understand the Bible one must first pray before each time he or she reads the Bible as taking in account that the Bible comes from outer space, then the things written therein are only spiritually discerned, and the human mind cannot in the natural understand what the Bible teaches. This is one of the reasons why some people find faults with the Bible, because the read the Bible without praying first and they become confused as to the meaning of the Word of God.

Conclusion on the geological column: It is unscientific, there is nowhere on earth where we can find the geological column in the order found in the drawings in the textbooks. This geological column does not exist. The layers were laided up very fast during the flood. Take a jar of dirt and sake it, in a few minutes you will have different layers. These layers also do not have billions of years.



 Which brings us to the questions of the millions of years. This is very important as if the Bible is true, then the earth must have 6000 years. Taking Adam and Eve and adding all generations to today we arrive at 6000 years of creation. One more point is that adding all generations from Adam to today we arrive at 7 billion persons. Oh! And this is exactly what we find today in the world, isn’t this amazing! If the theory of evolution was true then if man had appeared on earth about 150 million years ago they say, then we should have 150.000 persons per square inch.

Wow, this would be a crowded earth. How many people would that make in your house/ How many people would that make in your street? How many people should there be in your town! Thus we see that the theory of evolution is in total error on the population of the earth.

Evolutionists on the other hand say that the earth is billions of years old. What proof do you think evolutionists have to prove that the earth and the universe would be billons of years old? They use a) dating methods b) the geological column c) the fossil record

We just saw the geological column lie so for the dating methods. All dating methods are based on the same assumptions 1) All matter used to be constant 2) All carbon 14 used to be carbon 12 3) The electromagnetic field should have been constant since the big bang.

Well we already saw that the big bang never happened. But for the dating methods to work thee three assumptions would need to be true. But none of them is true 1) Matter has not been constant 2) Not all carbon 14 has always been carbon 12 3) The electromagnetic field has had great fluctuations in its history. Thus when someone says ‘We know the age of this fossils or this bone’ they do not know at all, they assume by faulty methods, and doing this the arrive at faulty results.

About 405 of known young object have false dating by the carbon 14 methods. Knowing that the older an object the error is exponential. Then we see that the dating methods are totally in erros about the billions of years story. Nothing on earth nor the stars nor anything in the universe has more than 6000 years. Except God’s kingdom, angels and his creatures.

One example is that is the planets would have been formed billions of years ago and they are cooling down, then all the planets should be totally cold now. Yet for example two of the moons of Jupiter are IO and Europa. Europa is a totally cold planet, but Io has 300 active volcanoes. Thee volcanoes shoot females 300 miles in the air, every 3 hours! But how can this be when Europa and Io are supposed to have come out from Jupiter? If you are honest, evolution is totally destroyed just by this example. If evolution is true then we should have the ‘oldest stars’ at the other surface of the universe, yet this is not the case. With the centrifugal force this should be the case. Why is it no the case if evolution is true and the universe would have existed since billions of years?

If the evolution theory is true then we should have also all the stars in the universe evenly distributed. There should not be clusters of stars in different part of the universe if the big bang really happened. Why are there beautiful cluster of stars which clearly show a Designer and a plan? If evolution was true then all the stars should be evenly distributed. Why aren’t they? This is because the universe is only 6000 years old and created by God.

Thy say that the trilobites are some of the most ancient creatures who supposedly lived millions of years ago, yet on Jun 1, 1968 William Meister an evolutionist found a human footprint stepping on a trilobite. How can this be if trilobites would have lived millions of years before humans?

In fact it was the footprint of a sandal. Were sandals invented millions of years ago? Or weren’t trilobites abound millions of years ago by always lived with man? This proves that the earth and its creatures only have 6000 years not millions.

In the Paluxy river I Glenrose Texas, have been found dino tracks with human tracks inside. This amazing event made the news and media to be on the spot. Evolutionists came from different places to see if this was really true. When news media asked a scientific evolutionist if he had looked at the tracks, he responded ‘ No I do not want to look at the tracks’ Thus we have here the roof that the world of evolution especially those in leadership of this so called scientific organization better called religious and cultic organisation are not after facts, but they are after all kinds of methods to expel God from the minds and excise themselves while on this earth. Nevertheless the Bible says that they will have no excuse.

Let’s say a hurricane is coming, and someone says that he does not belive in the hurricane. Does his belief makes it so that the hurricane will change his mind? No Lets say someone does not believe in tsunamis. If a tsunami hits his town, does his non belief in tsunamis makes it so that the tsunami will not come? No . Then the same is true with God if someone does not believe in God then his personal opinion and belief does not change truth and the facts that God does exist.

The only way someone’s opinion would be true on ‘God does not exist’ would be that this person would be the creator of the universe. But as not one human being has ever created the universe, thus God exist. The only reason someone can think false or use lying to come to conclusions proves that God exists and that God does not want forced love, but someone who examines the facts and comes to right conclusions. Then we can conclude that if someone whether educated or not, scientific or not, who uses prejudice and lying, can this person come to the truth? No. It is


impossible for someone who uses lying to come to the truth as truth can only be found by being honest.

If someone believes that his car has no flat tire, he goes around the car but refuses to face the fact. Does reality makes it so that the flat tire disapears? No.

If modern evolutionistic science tarts with the assumption that all science comes from evolution and that god chance and god randomness created everything by they daughter ‘natural selection’ and that another fact that can be brought to the table will automatically be rejected, then what will be the result of the findings? Evolution.

For example if I tell you: ‘go in the store and I want you to only see oranges in the store, you cannot see anything else than oranges’ The person comes out of the store and says ‘I only saw oranges’ Does it make it so that the store only had oranges? No

But by false assumptions evolutionists come to false conclusions. They lie to themselves in the first place, thus cannot arrive to the right destination. Like someone going to New York from Michigan, but who takes the road to Los Angeles, This person can be sure to b on the right track and can willfully refuse to see the truth of his error, but it will not make this person to arrive in New York.

Pr 14:12 ‘There is a way which seems right to a man, But its end is the way of death’


One good argument to point out is that when evolutionists ask such and such a questions and creationists do not have the answer. Then the answer is easy as if God is God then surely there are many things about Him that we do not know and probably will never know. And the Bible tells us that God keep many things a mystery from us.

But on the part of the evolutionists when we ask a question about the theory of evolution and they do not have the answer, this is a big problem, because anything taught in school should have the answers and any question asked should be able to be answered. How can a topic be taught in school for the which the teacher has no answers to the student’s questions! It would not be conceiveable. This topic would be quite speedily be removed from the classroom as it would not be able to be taught as fact. This is the case for the evolution theory. The theory of evolution should not be taught as fact and it should not be taught at all until all the answers could be answered on the topic. This proves that the theory of evolution is a religion.

Questions like

1 Where does matter come from if the theory of evolution is true?

2 Where does energy come from if the theory of evolution is true?

3 Where do laws come from if evolution theory is true?

4 Where are the billions of transitional fossils?

5 Lign up in a field all transitional fossils one one specie from the first on to the last?

6 Then add up all the species on earth and lign up all the billions of transitional fossils from the first to the last development of this specie.

7 Who made natural selection?

8 How did natural selection start?

9 Does natural selection has a brain, intelligence, thought or planning power?

10 Then how does natural selection know what to select without a plan?

11 How does she knows in advance what the end product will be without a brain, nor intelligence?

Who ever saw a creature changing into a different creature, prove all creatures transformed into something else.

12 How come trilobites and other Cambrian creatures appeared suddendly?

These and many more questions cannot be answered by a topic which is taught in school as fact. Thus if the theory of evolution really was science these would be answers. Thus if the theory of evolution was really science its advocates would be able to answer these questions. It boggles the mind to think that a topic such as evolution is taught in school yet no teacher anywhere on earth can answer these questions, yet they teach this theory as if they knew all the answers.

For God I agree I do not know everything as God is all powerful and mysterious, but the

evolutionists need to agree and be honest on the fact that evolution is also a religion which is taken a faith value and only believed by faith. Faith in who? Faith in the teacher’s diploma. Whatever the teacher says it becomes the word of God. I think people and the masses have to rethink about taking all things taught as truth and fact.

Well lets answer these questions for them

1 Where does matter come from if the evolution theory is true? In fact this is a very good questions for the which no person on earth and no evolution scientist has any answer. If God created the universe, then as God is all powerful then He can create matter. But if the universe came about with randomness and chance. Then these so called powers randomness and chance would have no way to create matter, as randomness and chance are not living entities.


A good questions to ask here too is Where dies randomness and chance come from? Who created chance and randomness. If all things came from a big bang, then a rock appeared, then it rained on the rocks for millions of years, then the rain transformed into primordial soup. Then a living cell appeared. When we ask.

How did that happen. They say ‘chance and randomness’ Then where did these processes come from? They do not know. Then we see that matter is a serious subject as all things are created of matter. If evolution was true then we should have the explanation about where matter comes from. ‘Well they do not know this yet’ Then why should they teach something in schools for the which they do not know the answer and teach is as fact?

Maybe there is a hidden agenda here as someone normally would not teach a subject in school unless they would really know that this subject was true. It is like explaining the end of something, but not knowing where it came from. Then the best thing would be to wait until someone found out where matter came from where energy came from where chance came from and randomness and how they were created. Until then no one should be able to teach that they came by naturalistic processes. Who created naturalistic processes anyway?

2 Where does energy come from if the theory of evolution is true? One second of the sun’s energy is equivalent as one billions citie’s energy, if there was such a thing as one billion cities on earth. The sun is burning an amazing amount of energy. Where does this energy comes from? Your body is burning thousands of calories all the time. Amazing energy. Who created this system? And energy itself. Where does it come from. Who made it so that bodies and planets burn energy? This is a software, someone must have planed, designed and built the softwares. As in computers, softwares do not come about one morning when we turn on the computer. Someone clearly did create energy.

If evolution is true, then energy must come from chance and randomness and here we ask the same question. Then how would chance and randomness create energy. Understanding that these powers would if they had created all the universe and all humans and animals would have needed an amazing amount of energy themselves. But chance and randomness are not living entities, thus they cannot have energy, nor can they create energy. Needing energy themselves and needing to have been thought of, planed and created themselves. Thus energy coming from the evolution theory is utterly impossible. As only an intelligent being must have created energy. Someone who is self living the I AM. Someone who eould have the power to bring into existence such a thing as energy.

3) Where do laws come from if evolution is true?

If the toeory of evolution is true then we should have no lwas in the universe, thus no human being would be able to crate laws too, as this proves a legislator. Someone who would have the power to lesgislate, and if legislator then someone who would have the right to judge His creation. The laws such as the Newton laws of motion and other laws could not have evolved. Questions How did the laws in the universe come about? How would they have evolved?


Why do e have laws? I do not want an answer like ‘Maybe evergy got tohether and natural selection evolved laws in such and such a manner’ This is no explanation but just fancy. And many times evolutionists will give an answer which is totally fairy tale, just to prove their point, no seeing that they would invent whatever as long as it would fit their theory. But in this case we leave the realm of science and enter the realm of fairy tale and dungons and dragons.

If we have laws, it is very logical to come to the conclusion that these laws come from a legislator. The signe like 55 on the highways, did they fall from the sky? Or did the 55 signs on the roads evolve from a tree milions of years ago? Then how did they come to be? Someone put them there. But the law itself not to drive more than 55 who created it? An alien who visited the earth? No The law 55 fell from the sky? No. Someone with a brain made a law a legislator. Thus we can conclude also that the laws of the universe come from a being who ca think and is a legislator. In this case someone who can judge his creatures.

4 Where are the billions of transitional fossils? This is an important question, as lets say you just came to know about all these things about science, creation and evolution, and you are someone very honest. You are not biased by working in a scientific environment nor do you have family members heavily involved in evolution. Then your first question will be ‘You say all animals evolved from one another, and your two ways of proving this is a) the geological column b) the so called transitional fossils like Archeopterix.

You also say that if would require about 150 milion changes to go from one specie to another. My question is:

‘If this was so, then we would have pure facts about all these changes from all species and all forms of life and all kinds of animals, from land and sea. Right? And each specie and kind of animal would need to produce 150 million transitions. Then if we calculate al species on earth which has been numbered to 8,7 million which would equal to 1305 billon transitional fossils.

So I want you to lign un in a field all the 150 million transitional fossils which went from a fish to a bird.’

‘Well we do not have all these transitional fossils’

‘This causes a big problem, because, this mean that most people believe in evolution without any proof’

‘Yes they do, in fact they trust what the teachers and scientists tell them without any proof for themselves’

‘Isn’t this manipulation and abusing power and the credulity of people on diplomas? Then if to go from one animal to the next if would require 150 million transition, then we can also conclude that 150 million less 2 fossils would all be transitional fossils’


This means that for each fossil we find in the dirt of a beginning creature or a regular animal we

Should find 150 million less 2 of transitional fossils.’

‘Yes this is correct, the great majority of fossils we find should be transitional fossils’

‘Yet how come most fossils we find are not transitional fossils?’

‘It proves that evolution never took place’

‘Not only that but mathematically is all creatures changed into other creatures, and it takes 150 million transitions, then more than 99% of all fossils should be transitional fossils’

‘Yes, there is no proof that evolution ever did took place, in fact Paterson who is in charge of 50% of all fossils in the world along with Raup and Elredge says ‘if I knew of one transitional fossil I would have included it in my book, such a fossil does not exist’

‘But it evolution really happened, then the proof should be in the fossils, without proof in the fossils then evolution is just the figment if someone’s imagination which has become legel to study for political reasons, but for the which there is no scientific proof’

5 Can any scientist on earth be able to lign up in a field somewhere on earth all transitional fossils one one specie to another from the first on to the last?

No, no one on earth can lign up all fossils which would go from one specie to another. Thus there is no prof for evolution. Having fossils like archeopterix and a few so called transitional fosils doe sno count. They say that you could be able to put all the transitional fossils in a little box and they would all fit together. That’s how few transitional fossils we have on earth. This is not proof at all for evolution. In a court of law, these fraud bones like Archeopterix is would not count for evidence.


They would be struck down.The only reason evolutionists would win in court like in the Dover trial is that they are on the side of what is socially acceptable, and what is lawful by law: evolution teaching. Who ever legalized the teaching of evolution in schools? I do not know. I know that in England the club X and Huxley were responsible for the propaganda of Darwin’s ideas. Seeing that the Club X was in charge of all science, then what they decides became law in England. Then as the world saw that this was a ‘good excuse’ to forget God, the most nations on earth adopted this false teaching. Yet lying to oneself is no ‘good excuse’ .


Just because someone believes in something, it does not make it true. There is need of proof and evidences to make something true. Just because the laws of the lands in most countries teach evolution does not mean that it is true.

In the middle ages most lands taught that the earth was the center of the universe, and most scientists taught this. It does not make it true.

One hundred years ago most physicians taught that you had to let the blood out of a person to heal them. We know know that this is false.

About 50 years Ago the world of medicine was still performing lobotomies, we now know that lobotomies are very dangerous. Just because the majority teache something does not make it true.

Most people think, ‘Well if there is a God, He will excuse mefor having believed the theory of evolution. After all most people in my country, or city or in the school I attended believed in evolution, thus God will understand that as we humans judge by what other people ar edoing, then God will understand that I just followed the crowd, I just went along with the majority, I just followed the current of though in my days, and God will totally understand this.’

‘No God will not understand this, even if most people in your country and town did evil, you have the responsibility not to follow in their footsteps.’

‘ But would God expect me to investigate by myself if what is taught in school is true? After all isn’t God responsible for the powersof this planet and isn’t God responsible for the teachings in school and in the media? After all if God is the crator, surely He would be in control and responsible for the teachings on television and in the schools and universities’


‘No,God does not control nor force man to teach anything. The God of the Bible chooses a few man on earth to bring his message of salvation and warning about the earth ending very soon, and the end of the world which will come as a big surprise to many. But God does not force man’s will. God does not impose a certain curriculum in schools.


If the governments as some are choose to totally remove God from the school curriculums, God does not force them not to. But the Bible tells us that for everything there will be a judgment.And those who taught many childerns evolution and brainwashed them for life about evolution and made them not to believe in the Bible ( as someone who believes in randomness cannot believe at the same time in God’s creation) will be very severely judged)